Nursing research summary

Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units

This Egyptian nursing study found significant issues with handover processes between ED and in-patient units. Key findings: 33% rarely asked questions during handovers; 77% were dissatisfied; 30% experienced errors due to poor communication; nearly half (49.9%) did not provide total information themselves. Nurses emphasized the need for accurate/honest info and structured standardized processes. Recommendations include implementing tailored tools and training programs.

Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal Published 2021 4 min read DOI 10.21608/tsnj.2021.171327

In brief

This Egyptian nursing study found significant issues with handover processes between ED and in-patient units. Key findings: 33% rarely asked questions during handovers; 77% were dissatisfied; 30% experienced errors due to poor communication; nearly half (49.

What this article is about

Quick Answer

This Egyptian nursing study found significant issues with handover processes between ED and in-patient units. Key findings: 33% rarely asked questions during handovers; 77% were dissatisfied; 30% experienced errors due to poor communication; nearly half (49.9%) did not provide total information themselves. Nurses emphasized the need for accurate/honest info and structured standardized processes. Recommendations include implementing tailored tools and training programs.

Student takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • 33.3% of nurses rarely had opportunity to ask questions/clarify info during handover
  • 77% of nurses were dissatisfied with current handover process
  • 30% reported experiencing error due to ineffective communication during handover
  • 45% viewed accurate/honest information as important for improvement, 31% saw structured standardized process as key
  • 49.9% did not provide total information during handover

Student summary

Why This Research Matters

This article, titled 'Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units,' explores a critical aspect of nursing practice: the handover process. The study was conducted at Tanta University Emergency Hospital in Egypt by Shereen Dorgahm and Heba Obied. It is an open-access journal article published in the 'Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal' on May 1, 2021.

The research focuses on understanding how nurses experience the handover process when patients are transferred from the Emergency Department (ED) to in-patient units. Handovers are crucial for patient safety because they ensure that all relevant information about a patient is accurately communicated between healthcare providers. The authors frame this as a nursing problem by highlighting communication failures as a major source of medical errors or sentinel events, which can have serious consequences for patients.

The study used a cross-sectional, correlational design to assess factors affecting nurses' experiences with the current handover process. A sample of 60 nurses from Tanta University Emergency Hospital participated in the research. The authors utilized one structured questionnaire that consisted of three parts: Nursing Satisfaction with Handover, Current Handover Process Quality, and Information Inventory Provided in Current Handover Process.

The findings revealed several important insights into how nurses experience handovers: 1. A significant portion (33.3%) of the nurses reported they rarely had an opportunity to ask questions or clarify information during the handover process. This suggests that communication may not always be open and transparent, potentially leading to misunderstandings. 2. An even larger majority (77%) of the participating nurses expressed dissatisfaction with the current handover process. This indicates a widespread perception among these nurses that the existing system is flawed or ineffective in meeting their needs for clear patient information transfer. 3. A concerning number, specifically 30%, reported experiencing errors during the handover process due to ineffective communication. This directly links poor handover practices to potential risks of medical mistakes. 4. When asked about what would improve the handover process, a substantial majority (45%) viewed providing accurate and honest information as important, while another significant group (31%) emphasized the need for a structured standardized process. These findings highlight key areas where improvements could be made to enhance both safety and satisfaction. 5. Furthermore, nearly half of the nurses surveyed (49.9%) admitted that they did not provide total information during handover processes themselves. This finding is particularly important as it points towards systemic issues or individual practices within the nursing staff regarding thoroughness in communication.

When appraising this study, students should consider several aspects: * **Source and Rights:** The paper is available through DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) with a high confidence score for its source information. It's important to note that while it provides valuable insights into nursing practice at Tanta University Emergency Hospital in Egypt, the findings might not be universally generalizable without further research. * **Research Design:** The cross-sectional design means data was collected once from participants; this can provide a snapshot of experiences but may not capture changes over time or establish causality. However, for assessing current experiences and satisfaction levels, it is appropriate. * **Sample Size and Setting:** The study involved 60 nurses from one specific hospital in Egypt. While this provides meaningful data about that particular setting, the results should be interpreted with caution if applied to other contexts without further validation.

As a nurse, reasoning from this evidence would involve recognizing the clear need for improvement in handover processes at Tanta University Emergency Hospital and potentially similar settings. The high rates of dissatisfaction (77%) and reported errors due to ineffective communication (30%) are strong indicators that current practices fall short of ensuring optimal patient safety and care continuity. Nurses should advocate for changes such as implementing standardized tools tailored to the ED context and each inpatient unit, which could help optimize handover quality. Additionally, conducting training programs aimed at enhancing nurses' satisfaction by equipping them with knowledge and skills to manage these intricate processes more effectively would be a logical next step based on the study's recommendations.

In summary, this research underscores that while handovers are fundamental for patient safety, there are significant challenges in their current implementation. The experiences of nurses surveyed highlight issues related to communication opportunities, overall satisfaction with existing procedures, error rates linked directly to poor communication, and a lack of complete information sharing during these critical transitions between care settings.

Source abstract

Study Overview

Handover process is fundamental and crucial component of patient safety care. Communication failure constitutes a major source of medical mistakes or sentinel events. So the study aimed to assess factors affecting nurses’ experiences related to current handover process between emergency department and in-patient units.A cross- section, correlational design was used. The study was conducted at Tanta University Emergency Hospital, (60) nurses were included. One Structured Questionnaire was used; including three parts Nursing Satisfaction with Handover, Current Handover Process Quality, and Information Inventory Provided in Current Handover Process. (33.3%) of the nurses reported they rarely had opportunity to ask questions and to clarify information during handover process. (77%) of them were dissatisfied with the current handover process. (30%) reported they experienced error during handover process due to ineffective communication. (45% and 31%) of the nurses viewed that providing accurate and honest information and availability of structured standardized process is important to improve handover process. 49.9% of the nurses viewed they did not provide total information during handover process So, we recommended establishing standardized tools according to ED context and each inpatient unit to optimize the quality of handover process, and conduct training programs to enhance nurses’ satisfaction by helping them to gain knowledge and apply tools to manage the intricate nature of handover process.

Study type: Open access journal article

Evidence appraisal

Main Findings

  • 33.3% of nurses rarely had opportunity to ask questions/clarify info during handover
  • 77% of nurses were dissatisfied with current handover process
  • 30% reported experiencing error due to ineffective communication during handover
  • 45% viewed accurate/honest information as important for improvement, 31% saw structured standardized process as key
  • 49.9% did not provide total information during handover

Practice transfer

Clinical Relevance

  • Implementing standardized tools tailored to ED and inpatient unit contexts can optimize handover quality.
  • Conducting training programs focused on enhancing nurses' satisfaction with handovers by improving their knowledge and application of effective communication strategies is crucial for managing the complex nature of patient transitions between care settings.
  • Improving opportunities for questions and clarification during handovers could reduce misunderstandings and errors, directly impacting patient safety.
  • Emphasizing accurate information provision (45% importance) and structured processes (31% importance) as identified by nurses themselves can lead to more reliable and safer handover practices.
  • Addressing the issue where nearly half of nurses do not provide total information during handovers is critical for ensuring comprehensive care continuity and preventing adverse events.

Faculty notes

Educational Relevance

This article by Dorgahm and Obied (2021) investigates factors influencing nurses' experiences with the handover process when patients are transferred from an Emergency Department (ED) to in-patient units at Tanta University Emergency Hospital, Egypt. Employing a cross-sectional, correlational design, 60 nurses completed a structured questionnaire assessing their satisfaction with handovers, perceptions of current process quality, and information inventory during these transitions.

The study's key findings reveal significant concerns within the ED-to-inpatient unit handover system: 1. A substantial proportion (33.3%) of nurses reported rarely having opportunities to ask questions or clarify information during handovers, indicating potential gaps in interactive communication. 2. An overwhelming majority (77%) expressed dissatisfaction with the current handover process itself, suggesting widespread perceptions that existing methods are inadequate for ensuring effective patient care transitions. 3. A concerning 30% of nurses reported experiencing errors attributable to ineffective communication during these handovers, directly linking poor practices to potential risks for patients. 4. When queried about improvements, a large segment (45%) emphasized the importance of providing accurate and honest information, while another significant group (31%) highlighted the need for structured standardized processes as crucial elements for enhancement. 5. Nearly half of the nurses surveyed (49.9%) admitted they did not provide total information during handover processes themselves; this finding is critical as it points to systemic or individual shortcomings in thoroughness that can compromise patient safety and continuity of care.

These findings underscore a clear need for intervention at Tanta University Emergency Hospital. The high rates of dissatisfaction (77%) and reported errors due to ineffective communication (30%) are particularly alarming, indicating that current practices may not be meeting the standards required for safe and effective patient handovers. The authors' recommendations—establishing standardized tools tailored to specific ED contexts and inpatient units, coupled with targeted training programs designed to enhance nurses' satisfaction and equip them with better strategies for managing these complex interactions—are well-grounded in their evidence.

For faculty, this study serves as a valuable resource for teaching about patient safety, communication skills, and quality improvement initiatives in nursing education. It provides concrete examples of how research can identify specific areas within clinical practice that require attention and change. The methodology is appropriate for its aims (assessing current experiences), but instructors should guide students to critically evaluate the generalizability of these findings from a single Egyptian hospital setting. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of fostering environments where nurses feel empowered to ask questions during handovers and are supported in providing complete information.

Critical appraisal

Limitations

  • The study was conducted at a single hospital (Tanta University Emergency Hospital) in Egypt, limiting generalizability to other settings or regions without further research.
  • The sample size of 60 nurses, while providing specific insights, may not capture the full spectrum of experiences across larger or more diverse nursing populations.
  • As a cross-sectional study, it provides a snapshot of current experiences but cannot establish causality between factors and outcomes over time.

Classroom use

Discussion Questions

  • How might cultural differences in communication styles impact handover effectiveness compared to what was observed at Tanta University Emergency Hospital?
  • What specific elements of 'structured standardized process' did the 31% of nurses who prioritized this believe were most critical for improvement, and how do these align with existing evidence-based handover models like SBAR or I-PASS?
  • Considering that nearly half (49.9%) of nurses admitted not providing total information during handovers themselves, what systemic barriers might prevent them from doing so despite recognizing its importance?
  • How can the findings regarding dissatisfaction (77% of nurses) and error rates (30% due to ineffective communication) be used as a catalyst for quality improvement initiatives within similar healthcare institutions in other countries?
  • What specific components of 'training programs' would you recommend based on this study's recommendations, and how could their effectiveness be measured beyond just increased satisfaction?
  • Discussion question 6: What does "Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units" help nursing students evaluate?
  • Discussion question 7: What does "Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units" help nursing students evaluate?
  • Discussion question 8: What does "Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units" help nursing students evaluate?
  • Discussion question 9: What does "Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units" help nursing students evaluate?
  • Discussion question 10: What does "Factors Affecting Nurses’ Experiences Related to Current Handover Process between Emergency Department and In-patient Units" help nursing students evaluate?

Knowledge check

Quiz

1. What percentage of nurses in the study reported they rarely had an opportunity to ask questions and clarify information during handover?

  1. 30%
  2. 45%
  3. 77%
  4. 33.3%
Answer: 33.3%
Rationale: The abstract states that 33.3% of the nurses reported this issue.

2. What percentage of nurses were dissatisfied with the current handover process?

  1. 30%
  2. 45%
  3. 77%
  4. 60%
Answer: 77%
Rationale: The abstract indicates that 77% of the nurses were dissatisfied.

3. Approximately what percentage of nurses reported experiencing an error during handover due to ineffective communication?

  1. 31%
  2. 30%
  3. 45%
  4. 77%
Answer: 30%
Rationale: The abstract mentions that 30% of the nurses experienced such errors.

4. What two factors did approximately half (or more) of the nurses view as important for improving handover process quality?

  1. Providing accurate and honest information; Availability of structured standardized process
  2. Availability of structured standardized process; Conduct training programs
  3. Conduct training programs; Establish standardized tools according to ED context
  4. Establish standardized tools according to ED context; Each inpatient unit having its own tool
Answer: Providing accurate and honest information; Availability of structured standardized process
Rationale: The abstract states that 45% (for providing accurate/honest info) and 31% (for availability of structured/standardized process) viewed these as important.

5. What percentage of nurses reported they did not provide total information during handover?

  1. 77%
  2. 60%
  3. 30%
  4. 49.9%
Answer: 49.9%
Rationale: The abstract states that 49.9% of the nurses viewed this as their experience.

6. What was a key recommendation made by the authors to improve handover process quality?

  1. Conduct training programs for all hospital staff
  2. Establish standardized tools according to ED context and each inpatient unit
  3. Implement mandatory use of electronic health records during handovers
  4. Increase the frequency of handover sessions
Answer: Establish standardized tools according to ED context and each inpatient unit
Rationale: The abstract states this was a key recommendation.

7. What type of study design was used for this research?

  1. Longitudinal cohort study
  2. Cross-sectional correlational design
  3. Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
  4. Qualitative phenomenological study
Answer: Cross-sectional correlational design
Rationale: The abstract explicitly mentions the use of a cross-section, correlational design.

8. In which hospital was the study conducted?

  1. Tanta University Emergency Hospital
  2. Cairo University Medical Center
  3. Alexandria General Hospital
  4. Assiut Teaching Hospital
Answer: Tanta University Emergency Hospital
Rationale: The abstract specifies that the study was conducted at Tanta University Emergency Hospital.

9. How many nurses were included in this study?

  1. 30
  2. 60
  3. 77
  4. 45
Answer: 60
Rationale: The abstract states that 60 nurses were included in the study.

10. What is a primary reason cited for communication failure being a major source of medical mistakes or sentinel events, as mentioned in the introduction?

  1. Lack of standardized tools
  2. Ineffective communication
  3. Insufficient training programs
  4. High nurse-to-patient ratios
Answer: Ineffective communication
Rationale: The abstract's opening sentence states that 'Communication failure constitutes a major source of medical mistakes or sentinel events'.

Study cards

Flashcards

What was the primary aim of the study on handover processes in Tanta University Emergency Hospital?

The study aimed to assess factors affecting nurses’ experiences related to current handover process between emergency department and in-patient units.

Which design type did the researchers use for their investigation into nurse satisfaction with handover?

A cross-section, correlational design was used.

How many nurses were included as participants in this study conducted at Tanta University Emergency Hospital?

(60) nurses were included.

What percentage of nurses reported they rarely had the opportunity to ask questions and clarify information during handover?

(33.3%) of the nurses reported they rarely had opportunity to ask questions and to clarify information during handover process.

According to the study, what proportion of participating nurses were dissatisfied with the current handover process?

(77%) of them [the nurses] were dissatisfied with the current handover process.

What percentage of nurses reported experiencing an error during handover due to ineffective communication?

(30%) reported they experienced error during handover process due to ineffective communication.

Which two factors did 45% and 31% of nurses respectively view as important for improving the handover process?

Providing accurate and honest information (viewed by 45% of nurses) and availability of structured standardized process (viewed by 31% of nurses) is important to improve handover process.

What percentage of nurses indicated they did not provide total information during the handover process?

49.9% of the nurses viewed they did not provide total information during handover process.

What was one key recommendation made by the study authors for improving handover quality?

The study recommended establishing standardized tools according to ED context and each inpatient unit to optimize the quality of handover process.

What additional action was suggested by the researchers to enhance nurses' satisfaction with the handover process?

Conduct training programs to enhance nurses’ satisfaction by helping them to gain knowledge and apply tools to manage the intricate nature of handover process.

Flashcard 11: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 12: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 13: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 14: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 15: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 16: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 17: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 18: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 19: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Flashcard 20: How does this study support nursing learning?

It helps students connect nursing with evidence-based clinical reasoning.

Search-ready answers

Frequently asked questions

What was the main aim of the study on handover processes between emergency departments and in-patient units?

The study aimed to assess factors affecting nurses’ experiences related to current handover process between emergency department and in-patient units.

Which hospital did this nursing research take place at?

The study was conducted at Tanta University Emergency Hospital.

How many nurses were included as participants in the cross-sectional, correlational design of this study?

(60) nurses were included.

What percentage of participating nurses reported they rarely had an opportunity to ask questions and clarify information during handover?

(33.3%) of the nurses reported they rarely had opportunity to ask questions and to clarify information during handover process.

According to this study, what proportion of the nurses were dissatisfied with the current handover process?

(77%) of them [the participating nurses] were dissatisfied with the current handover process.

What percentage of nurses in this study reported experiencing an error during handover due to ineffective communication?

(30%) reported they experienced error during handover process due to ineffective communication.

Which two factors did 45% and 31% of the nurses respectively view as important for improving the handover process, according to this study?

(45% and 31%) of the nurses viewed that providing accurate and honest information and availability of structured standardized process is important to improve handover process.

What percentage of participating nurses indicated they did not provide total information during handover in this study?

49.9% of the nurses viewed they did not provide total information during handover process.

Based on these findings, what was one key recommendation made by the authors to improve handover processes?

The authors recommended establishing standardized tools according to ED context and each inpatient unit to optimize the quality of handover process.

What other type of intervention did the study's authors recommend for enhancing nurses’ satisfaction with the handover process?

The authors also recommended conduct training programs to enhance nurses’ satisfaction by helping them to gain knowledge and apply tools to manage the intricate nature of handover process.